The Range — Notebook №4 to №12
This is the answer sheet for the little spiral notebook that flashes past in the video. Nine remote-viewing practice sessions, all drawn in one evening sitting on 24 July 2026 — and the video never shows what each page was actually aimed at. This page does: for every session №4–№12 you get the page I drew, the target it was aimed at, the little warm-up exercise for that draw, and how the blind judging went.
How a session works
- A button-press draws a sealed target from a pool of 80 real photographs (five classes: land, water, structure, energy, life). The tag on the phone is an encrypted reference — there is nothing to peek at, and the reveal later decrypts it as proof the target never moved.
- Each draw comes with a small exercise — "draw with your wrong hand", "colour before line". These are pen warm-up games that shape style, not content. They're the unimportant part, listed here only because you can see their fingerprints on the pages.
- A few minutes with the pen, then the page is photographed and sealed by upload. (The scribble in the top-right corner of every page is pen-priming — a clearing mark, never part of the read.)
- Blind judging: the page is set against four cards — the real target plus three decoys from other classes. A blind pick is right 25% of the time by pure luck.
- Reveal, self-score, and the result goes in the ledger — misses recorded in the same ink as hits. That's the whole point of the instrument.
The honest tally
At the four-card table: 2 hits out of 9 — which is chance (you'd expect ~2¼ from luck alone). That number stays. What made the night worth publishing is on the pages themselves: the sketches kept brushing the target's geometry and materials even when the final pick went wrong — and a pattern showed up in how the picks went wrong (see №9, №10 and №12) that changed how the judging works now.
All quoted notes below are exactly as typed that night, before the reveal unless marked otherwise.
№4 · the caldera road


Exercise of the draw: end with one written sentence and a confidence 0–4 — sign off like you mean it. First real session, first hit: picked the caldera card out of four. The road-to-a-dome geometry is the whole target in one line; the naming layer said "water" and the pick correctly ignored it.
№5 · hot blue


Exercise: lay colour fields before any line — where is it warm, where is it cold? Picked the energy card; miss. The keeper from this one: "hot blue" — temperature landed right (the tree is a furnace of blossom), hue came out wrong. Temperature and hue turn out to be separate channels, and the imagined cold-mountain scene had back-filled the hue. Also worth noticing: the target's stone gable is a near-match for the drawn peak — buildings kept arriving as landforms all night.
№6 · power from the bottom


Exercise: count the dominant axes before drawing — how many verticals vs horizontals want to exist? Picked the life card; miss. Read back against the target afterwards: solid mass below, thinner above — the stone quay and concrete lip under the towering wall — and the small yellow accent against a grey field, where the target's one loud accent is the yellow sign pair on the wall. Colour kept reporting the loudest accent, not the biggest area.
№7 · the two-minute road


Exercise: hard stop at two minutes — whatever is on the page is the session. The page grew a road with a dashed centreline; the target is a road with a dashed centreline. At the table the pick went to the fog-tower card instead — miss recorded. This is the night in miniature: page-to-target correspondence running ahead of the table result.
№8 · pipe energy


Exercise: pen touches paper within 3 seconds of the tag — one reflex mark before the head answers. Picked the water card; miss. But hold the sealed note against the photo: a round-windowed brick tower arriving as "pipe", and "bottom is swirly" over a literal sea of fog. The structure channel kept speaking in materials — masonry reaches the pen as plumbing and geology, the noun "building" never arrives.
№9 · the rumble strip


Exercise: first 30 seconds with the non-dominant hand (missed the instruction — noted honestly). The most specific material correspondence of the night, and it's fully non-visual: Grand Prismatic's microbial mats are layered, ridged and literally rubbery to the touch. At the table the eye went to the Yellowstone card first — then second-guessing switched to the lighthouse card the "boat" noun preferred. Miss recorded. The cost of that switch is what created the two-tap judging that starts at №10: the first pull now gets logged separately from the final pick.
№10 · the clean one


Exercise: the instant a colour fires, write temperature + hue and tag it FIELD or FLASH before the scene can vote. First pull, final pick and target all the same card. Every committed colour paid: yellow field, blue water, green standing shapes, red accent = the hut's red corrugated roof. And the one noun on the page — "school?" — matched the ornate town-hall decoy, not the target: noun-bait served and refused, geometry held. The green-mounds man took his home class clean.
№11 · the wrong postcard


Exercise: count the dominant axes before drawing. Pull went to one card, final pick to another — both wrong. But look at the ingredients: red roofs and green domes (the swatch trio), an autumn palette, one looming mass, "rock or something" for a castle's masonry. All real, all in the target — assembled by the naming layer into a coherent wrong postcard of a Canadian lake. Buildings arrive as materials; the noun goes missing, and the story fills the gap.
№12 · the giveaway


Exercise: first 60 seconds textures, temperatures, sounds and smells only — no shapes. The most instructive miss of the night. The first pull landed on the target. Deliberation then switched to the Niagara Falls card, distracted by its shiny vertical column — and lost. The audit rule that would have saved it was derived minutes later, unprompted: "I'd have felt the water, and I didn't." Even the struggle was signal — "was really dark, could hardly see anything" over a target that genuinely sits in heavy dusk, and "felt man made" over the one land card with a built subject. Cost a hit; bought a law.
What the night taught
- The signal channel is abstract and material — counts, axes, bands, textures, temperature land; nouns and finished scenes are where the imagination builds its coherent wrong postcards out of right ingredients.
- Buildings arrive as materials. A tower comes through as "pipe", a castle as "rock", a hut as "man made" plus a triangle diagram. The noun is the only thing missing.
- Colour reports salience, not area — the loudest accent in the frame, not the biggest field. And temperature and hue are separate channels that can disagree ("hot blue" vs a hot-red tree).
- The first pull outran deliberation. Where both were recorded, holding the pull won and every switch lost — №12 switched off the target itself. Small numbers, held honestly; the instrument now logs both columns every session.
Target photographs are Wikimedia Commons Featured Pictures — full credit and license under each image. The practice instrument is self-hosted: sealed draws, encrypted tags, decoy judging against a 25% chance floor, and a ledger that keeps the misses.